MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1024/1422-4917/a000073

Медицинская библиотека · Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · 2010

[Phoneme discrimination and dyslexia in school children at grade one to six].

Brunner Monika, Bäumer Claudia, Rosenauer Karin, Scheller Holger, Plinkert Peter

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The research on phoneme discrimination in connection with dyslexia has focused mostly on reading ability. The aim of this study was to analyse phoneme discrimination in relation to spelling ability in the context of different school grades.

METHOD: The data of 253 children in school grades 1 to 6 who were seen for diagnosis of dyslexia and auditory processing disorder were analyzed retrospectively. Phoneme discrimination was assessed via the Heidelberger Phoneme Discrimination Test at 3 levels: auditory discrimination, repetition of minimal pairs, and analyzing the initial consonants in phoneme clusters.

RESULTS

We found a high correlation of phoneme discrimination and spelling ability in the lower school grades. While the phoneme discrimination deficit still showed up in higher grades, its influence on spelling ability was greater in the first two grades. In the whole population, phoneme discrimination proved to be a significant criterion for differentiating poor and normal spelling ability.

CONCLUSION

Speech and language therapy and auditory processing training for dyslexic children should be adjusted according to these results.

Для цитирования: Brunner Monika, Bäumer Claudia, Rosenauer Karin, Scheller Holger, Plinkert Peter. [Phoneme discrimination and dyslexia in school children at grade one to six].. Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 2010. DOI: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000073.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.