MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric dentistry · 2012

Caries experience in individuals with cleft lip and palate.

Tannure Patricia Nivoloni, Costa Marcelo De Castro, Küchler Erika Calvano, Romanos Helena Freire, Granjeiro Jose Mauro, Vieira Alexandre R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess if children with clefts have an increased caries experience.

METHODS

Caries data was collected via clinical examination of 115 4- to 21-year-olds with clefts and 230 controls. Cleft type was confirmed through their medical records and fluoride exposure history; oral hygiene habits and dietary history were obtained though a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The adherence to the preventive oral health habits (tooth-brushing, use of fluoride, and dietary factors) were not different among groups excluding the use of dental floss. The mean DMFT was 1.20 (±1.8 SD) for the cleft group and 0.90 (±1.8) for the control group. There was no significant difference in the DMFT scores between children with clefts and the control group (P=.16). The mean dmft was 1.68 (±2.1) for the cleft group and 2.61 (±2.9) for the control group. The prevalence of dental caries in primary teeth was significantly lower in the cleft-affected children vs the control group (P=.02). The percentage of caries-free individuals was similar in cleft and control groups (P=.90), and was also similar in different cleft types (P=.67).

CONCLUSION

Caries experience in children born with clefts is not higher in comparison to control children.

Для цитирования: Tannure Patricia Nivoloni, Costa Marcelo De Castro, Küchler Erika Calvano, Romanos Helena Freire, Granjeiro Jose Mauro, Vieira Alexandre R. Caries experience in individuals with cleft lip and palate.. Pediatric dentistry. 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.