MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco.23.00903

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023

Patient-Reported Outcomes During and After Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the PROSPECT Trial (Alliance N1048).

Basch Ethan, Dueck Amylou C, Mitchell Sandra A, Mamon Harvey, Weiser Martin, Saltz Leonard, Gollub Marc, Rogak Lauren, Ginos Brenda, Mazza Gina L, Colgrove Brian, Chang George, Minasian Lori, Denicoff Andrea, Thanarajasingam Gita, Musher Benjamin, George Thomas, Venook Alan, Farma Jeffrey, O'Reilly Eileen, Meyerhardt Jeffrey A, Shi Qian, Schrag Deborah

Рандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаEquivalence TrialПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North America is neoadjuvant pelvic chemoradiation with fluorouracil (5FUCRT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is an alternative that may spare patients the morbidity of radiation. Understanding the relative patient experiences with these options is necessary to inform treatment decisions.

METHODS

PROSPECT was a multicenter, unblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOX versus 5FUCRT, which enrolled adults with rectal cancer clinically staged as T2N+, cT3N-, or cT3N+ who were candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery. Neoadjuvant FOLFOX was given in six cycles over 12 weeks, followed by surgery. Neoadjuvant 5FUCRT was delivered in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks, followed by surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was suggested but not mandated in both groups. Enrolled patients were asked to provide patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, during neoadjuvant treatment, and at 12 months after surgery. PROs included 14 symptoms from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Additional PRO instruments measured bowel, bladder, sexual function, and health-related quality of life (HRQL).

RESULTS

From June 2012 to December 2018, 1,194 patients were randomly assigned, 1,128 initiated treatment, and 940 contributed PRO-CTCAE data (493 FOLFOX; 447 5FUCRT). During neoadjuvant treatment, patients reported significantly lower rates of diarrhea and better overall bowel function with FOLFOX while anxiety, appetite loss, constipation, depression, dysphagia, dyspnea, edema, fatigue, mucositis, nausea, neuropathy, and vomiting were lower with 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted P < .05). At 12 months after surgery, patients randomly assigned to FOLFOX reported significantly lower rates of fatigue and neuropathy and better sexual function versus 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted P < .05). Neither bladder function nor HRQL differed between groups at any time point.

CONCLUSION

For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer choosing between neoadjuvant FOLFOX and 5FUCRT, the distinctive PRO profiles inform treatment selection and shared decision making.

Для цитирования: Basch Ethan, Dueck Amylou C, Mitchell Sandra A, Mamon Harvey, Weiser Martin, Saltz Leonard, Gollub Marc, Rogak Lauren, Ginos Brenda, Mazza Gina L, Colgrove Brian, Chang George, Minasian Lori, Denicoff Andrea, Thanarajasingam Gita, Musher Benjamin, George Thomas, Venook Alan, Farma Jeffrey, O'Reilly Eileen, Meyerhardt Jeffrey A, Shi Qian, Schrag Deborah. Patient-Reported Outcomes During and After Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the PROSPECT Trial (Alliance N1048).. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2023. DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00903.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.