MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4085/1062-6050-52.1.11

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of athletic training · 2017

Evaluation of Various Cooling Systems After Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia.

Tan Pearl M S, Teo Eunice Y N, Ali Noreffendy B, Ang Bryan C H, Iskandar Iswady, Law Lydia Y L, Lee Jason K W

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

CONTEXT: Rapid diagnosis and expeditious cooling of individuals with exertional heat stroke is paramount for survival.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of various cooling systems after exercise-induced hyperthermia.

DESIGN

Crossover study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two men (age = 24 ± 2 years, height = 1.76 ± 0.07 m, mass = 70.7 ± 9.5 kg) participated.

INTERVENTION(S): Each participant completed a treadmill walk until body core temperature reached 39.50°C. The treadmill walk was performed at 5.3 km/h on an 8.5% incline for 50 minutes and then at 5.0 km/h until the end of exercise. Each participant experienced 4 cooling phases in a randomized, repeated-crossover design: (1) no cooling (CON), (2) body-cooling unit (BCU), (3) EMCOOLS Flex.Pad (EC), and (4) ThermoSuit (TS). Cooling continued for 30 minutes or until body core temperature reached 38.00°C, whichever occurred earlier.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Body core temperature (obtained via an ingestible telemetric temperature sensor) and heart rate were measured continuously during the exercise and cooling phases. Rating of perceived exertion was monitored every 5 minutes during the exercise phase and thermal sensation every minute during the cooling phase.

RESULTS

The absolute cooling rate was greatest with TS (0.16°C/min ± 0.06°C/min) followed by EC (0.12°C/min ± 0.04°C/min), BCU (0.09°C/min ± 0.06°C/min), and CON (0.06°C/min ± 0.02°C/min; P < .001). The TS offered a greater cooling rate than all other cooling modalities in this study, whereas EC offered a greater cooling rate than both CON and BCU (P < .0083 for all). Effect-size calculations, however, showed that EC and BCU were not clinically different.

CONCLUSION

These findings provide objective evidence for selecting the most effective cooling system of those we evaluated for cooling individuals with exercise-induced hyperthermia. Nevertheless, factors other than cooling efficacy need to be considered when selecting an appropriate cooling system.

Для цитирования: Tan Pearl M S, Teo Eunice Y N, Ali Noreffendy B, Ang Bryan C H, Iskandar Iswady, Law Lydia Y L, Lee Jason K W. Evaluation of Various Cooling Systems After Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia.. Journal of athletic training. 2017. DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.1.11.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.