MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4040/jkan.2009.39.3.401

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2009

[Relationship of peer relationships, perceived parental rearing attitudes, self-reported attachment security, to loneliness in upper elementary school-age children].

Moon So-Hyun

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship of peer relationships, self-reported attachment security, perceived parental rearing attitudes, and loneliness in upper elementary school-age children.

METHODS

The data were collected from 207 students in grades 5 or 6, and descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson correlation coefficients and Stepwise multiple regression were used with the SPSS/PC 12.0 program to analyze the data.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in loneliness between the upper 25% and lower 25% groups of peer relationships, perceived parental rearing attitudes, and self-reported attachment security. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed affection-hostility in parental rearing attitudes, validation and conflict in peer relationships, and attachment security explained 39.6% of the total variance in loneliness.

CONCLUSION

These results may contribute to a better understanding of loneliness in upper elementary school-age children. The results of the present study indicate a need to develop nursing interventions to prevent and manage children's loneliness.

Для цитирования: Moon So-Hyun. [Relationship of peer relationships, perceived parental rearing attitudes, self-reported attachment security, to loneliness in upper elementary school-age children].. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2009. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2009.39.3.401.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.