The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2011
Safety and pharmacokinetics of ribavirin for the treatment of la crosse encephalitis.
Клиническое исследование I фазыКлиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McJunkin James E, Nahata Milap C, De Los Reyes Emily C, Hunt W Garrett, Caceres Manuel, Khan Raheel R, Chebib Mouna G, Taravath Sasidharan, Minnich Linda L, Carr Roxane, Welch Christine A, Whitley Richard J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: La Crosse viral encephalitis (LACVE) is associated with residual epilepsy and neurocognitive deficits in survivors. This report summarizes 3 phases of clinical studies of children treated with intravenous (IV) ribavirin (RBV), each one exploring a different phase (I, IIA, IIB) of clinical trial development.
METHODS: In phase I, 7 children with life-threatening LACVE were treated with emergency use RBV using a moderate IV dose (8.33 mg/kg/dose q 8 hours day 1, 5 mg/kg/dose q 8 hours days 2-10). In phase IIA, 12 children with severe LACVE were enrolled: 8 treated with RBV (same dose as phase I) and 4 with placebo. In phase IIB an escalated dose was used (33 mg/kg dose 1, then 16 mg/kg/dose q 6 hours for 4 days, and 8 mg/kg/dose q 8 hours for 3 days).
RESULTS: In a group of 15 children treated in phase I and phase IIA, RBV appeared safe at moderate dose, but based on steady-state RBV levels of 9.3 μM, estimated cerebrospinal fluid levels were less than 20% of the EC50 of RBV for LACVE. At the escalated dose used in phase IIB, adverse events occurred, likely related to RBV, and therefore the trial was discontinued. Nevertheless, valuable pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety data were obtained at moderate dose, with potential treatment implications for other indications.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the results do not support the use of RBV for LACVE, this nevertheless is the largest study of antiviral treatment for LACVE to date and the largest pharmacokinetic analysis of IV RBV in children for any indication.
METHODS: In phase I, 7 children with life-threatening LACVE were treated with emergency use RBV using a moderate IV dose (8.33 mg/kg/dose q 8 hours day 1, 5 mg/kg/dose q 8 hours days 2-10). In phase IIA, 12 children with severe LACVE were enrolled: 8 treated with RBV (same dose as phase I) and 4 with placebo. In phase IIB an escalated dose was used (33 mg/kg dose 1, then 16 mg/kg/dose q 6 hours for 4 days, and 8 mg/kg/dose q 8 hours for 3 days).
RESULTS: In a group of 15 children treated in phase I and phase IIA, RBV appeared safe at moderate dose, but based on steady-state RBV levels of 9.3 μM, estimated cerebrospinal fluid levels were less than 20% of the EC50 of RBV for LACVE. At the escalated dose used in phase IIB, adverse events occurred, likely related to RBV, and therefore the trial was discontinued. Nevertheless, valuable pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety data were obtained at moderate dose, with potential treatment implications for other indications.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the results do not support the use of RBV for LACVE, this nevertheless is the largest study of antiviral treatment for LACVE to date and the largest pharmacokinetic analysis of IV RBV in children for any indication.