MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.026

Медицинская библиотека · Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries · 2019

Air-fluidized therapy in the treatment of severe burns: A retrospective study from a burn intensive care unit in Austria.

Nickl Stefanie, Fochtmann-Frana Alexandra, Nedomansky Jakob, Hitzl Wolfgang, Kamolz Lars-Peter, Haslik Werner

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Air-fluidized therapy (AFT) has long been used in the treatment of severe burns. In patients with extensive burns involving the posterior trunk, we aim to keep affected posterior areas dry and to postpone their treatment, initially applying available split-thickness skin grafts in functionally more important regions. We retrospectively assessed the impact of AFT on the survival of patients treated in the burn intensive care unit (ICU) of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria, between 2003 and 2016.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study included patients aged ≥18 years with burned total body surface area (TBSA) ≥20% and IIb-III° thermal injuries on the posterior trunk who received AFT. Survival rates were compared with those predicted by the abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI). Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-five of 110 patients with posterior trunk burns received AFT. Their survival rate exceeded that predicted by the ABSI score (mean ABSI, 10.0 ± 2.0; 73.3% (95% CI: 62-83%) survival rate vs. 20-40% predicted; p <  0.0001); no such difference was observed in the non-AFT group (mean, 8.8 ± 1.9; 65.7% (95% CI: 48-81%) survival rate vs. 50-70% predicted). Patients receiving AFT had significantly greater TBSA (median, 50% (35-60) vs. 30% (25-45) and longer ICU stays (median, 63 (36-92) vs. 18 (9-52) days; both p <  0.0001). Fifty-one (68.0%) patients in the AFT group and 26 (74.3%) patients in the non-AFT group underwent posterior trunk surgery (p =  0.66) a median of 16 (10-26) and 5 (2.5-9.5) days, respectively, after admission (p <  0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving AFT had significantly better survival than predicted by ABSI score in contrast to patients not receiving AFT although burn injuries in this group were more severe (greater TBSA, higher ABSI). As intensive care was similar in these groups aside from AFT, the better survival could be attributed to this additional therapy.

Для цитирования: Nickl Stefanie, Fochtmann-Frana Alexandra, Nedomansky Jakob, Hitzl Wolfgang, Kamolz Lars-Peter, Haslik Werner. Air-fluidized therapy in the treatment of severe burns: A retrospective study from a burn intensive care unit in Austria.. Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.026.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.