MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.006

Медицинская библиотека · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2010

Auditory temporal processing and dyslexia in an orthographically consistent language.

Georgiou George K, Protopapas Athanassios, Papadopoulos Timothy C, Skaloumbakas Christos, Parrila Rauno

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We examined two hypotheses relating auditory processing to dyslexia in Greek, an orthographically consistent language. Study I examined the "P-center" or "beat detection" hypothesis (Goswami et al., 2002) in a sample of Grade 6 dyslexics, Grade 6 chronological age (CA) controls, and Grade 4 reading age (RA) controls. Study II examined the "temporal processing," or "rapid auditory processing" hypothesis (Tallal, 1980) in a sample of Grade 7 dyslexics, CA controls, and in two groups of CA matched children with low frequency discrimination or low tone sequencing performance. Both studies indicate that (a) as a group, dyslexic children did not perform significantly worse on auditory processing measures than the control groups; (b) measures of auditory processing mostly did not account for unique amount of variance in phonological processing, reading, or spelling; and (c) at an individual level of analysis, some of the dyslexic children experienced auditory temporal processing deficits. Implications on the importance of auditory processing in reading in orthographically consistent languages are discussed.

Для цитирования: Georgiou George K, Protopapas Athanassios, Papadopoulos Timothy C, Skaloumbakas Christos, Parrila Rauno. Auditory temporal processing and dyslexia in an orthographically consistent language.. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.