Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2019
Disentangling Heterogeneity in Alzheimer's Disease: Two Empirically-Derived Subtypes.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blanken Anna E, Dutt Shubir, Li Yanrong, Nation Daniel A, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Clinical-pathological Alzheimer's disease (AD) subtypes may help distill heterogeneity in patient presentation. To date, no studies have utilized neuropsychological and biological markers to identify preclinical subtypes with longitudinal stability.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to empirically derive AD endophenotypes using a combination of cognitive and biological markers.
METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis grouped dementia-free older adults using memory, executive and language abilities, and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β and phosphorylated tau. Brain volume differences, neuropsychological trajectory, and progression to dementia were compared, controlling for age, gender, education, and apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4).
RESULTS: Subgroups included asymptomatic-normal (n = 653) with unimpaired cognition and subthreshold biomarkers, typical AD (TAD; n = 191) showing marked memory decline, high ApoE4 rates and abnormal biomarkers, and atypical AD (AAD; n = 132) with widespread cognitive decline, intermediate biomarker levels, older age, less education and more white matter lesions. Cognitive profiles showed longitudinal stability with corresponding patterns of cortical atrophy, despite nearly identical rates of progression to AD dementia.
CONCLUSION: Two clinical-pathological AD subtypes are identified with potential implications for preventative efforts.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to empirically derive AD endophenotypes using a combination of cognitive and biological markers.
METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis grouped dementia-free older adults using memory, executive and language abilities, and cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β and phosphorylated tau. Brain volume differences, neuropsychological trajectory, and progression to dementia were compared, controlling for age, gender, education, and apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4).
RESULTS: Subgroups included asymptomatic-normal (n = 653) with unimpaired cognition and subthreshold biomarkers, typical AD (TAD; n = 191) showing marked memory decline, high ApoE4 rates and abnormal biomarkers, and atypical AD (AAD; n = 132) with widespread cognitive decline, intermediate biomarker levels, older age, less education and more white matter lesions. Cognitive profiles showed longitudinal stability with corresponding patterns of cortical atrophy, despite nearly identical rates of progression to AD dementia.
CONCLUSION: Two clinical-pathological AD subtypes are identified with potential implications for preventative efforts.