World neurosurgery · 2020
Comparison of Intraoperative Computed Tomography Scan with Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Determining Deep Brain Stimulation Electrode Coordinates.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Girgis Fady, Zarabi Hosniya, Said Mena, Zhang Lin, Shahlaie Kiarash, Saez Ignacio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for a variety of refractory movement disorders. Accurate lead placement in the target nucleus is critical to ensure therapeutic effects and to minimize side effects, and intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) scan has been used to target and confirm lead position. The objective of this study is to compare the accuracy of determining the x, y, and z coordinates of final lead placement using iCT scan relative to postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 83 patients who underwent insertion of 145 DBS leads from 2015 to 2017 at a single institution. iCT scan was merged with the preoperative MRI to determine lead coordinates on both magnetic resonance and computed tomography images independently, and the absolute differences between the x, y, and z coordinates between the 2 scans along with the Euclidean vectors were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean absolute differences ± standard error of the mean between iCT scan and postoperative MRI coordinates were as follows: x = 0.01 ± 0.09 mm (P = 0.89), y = 1.67 ± 0.14 mm (P < 0.001), and z = 2.75 ± 0.15 mm (P < 0.001). The average Euclidean vector difference was 3.21 ± 0.15 mm (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist between iCT scan and postoperative MRI DBS y and z lead coordinates, but not with x coordinates. Based on this series, iCT scan is more accurate when confirming x coordinates, and less accurate for confirming y and z coordinates during DBS operations.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 83 patients who underwent insertion of 145 DBS leads from 2015 to 2017 at a single institution. iCT scan was merged with the preoperative MRI to determine lead coordinates on both magnetic resonance and computed tomography images independently, and the absolute differences between the x, y, and z coordinates between the 2 scans along with the Euclidean vectors were calculated.
RESULTS: The mean absolute differences ± standard error of the mean between iCT scan and postoperative MRI coordinates were as follows: x = 0.01 ± 0.09 mm (P = 0.89), y = 1.67 ± 0.14 mm (P < 0.001), and z = 2.75 ± 0.15 mm (P < 0.001). The average Euclidean vector difference was 3.21 ± 0.15 mm (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist between iCT scan and postoperative MRI DBS y and z lead coordinates, but not with x coordinates. Based on this series, iCT scan is more accurate when confirming x coordinates, and less accurate for confirming y and z coordinates during DBS operations.