Lasers in surgery and medicine · 1999
Histologic analysis of the thermal effect on epidermal and dermal structures following treatment with the superpulsed CO2 laser and the erbium: YAG laser: an in vivo study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Utley D S, Koch R J, Egbert B M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the in vivo histologic effects of the carbon dioxide (CO2) and erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) lasers. To ascertain the effects of combining CO2 and Er:YAG laser modalities during a single treatment session.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients underwent laser treatment to four left preauricular sites 7 days prior to rhytidectomy as follows: CO2 alone, CO2/Er:YAG, Er:YAG alone, and Er:YAG/CO2. The right preauricular area was identically treated 1 hour prior to rhytidectomy. Laser treated skin was excised during rhytidectomy and was evaluated histopathologically in a blinded manner.
RESULTS: After 7 days, all groups were reepithelialized and showed equal neo-collagen formation. After 7 days, CO2/Er:YAG and Er:YAG alone had the least collagen injury and thickest epidermis and papillary dermis of all groups. Specimens lased 1 hour prior to excision showed the least collagen injury and thermal necrosis when treated with CO2/Er:YAG and Er:YAG alone. Four passes with CO2 removed 250 microm of tissue, while eight passes with the Er:YAG removed 160 microm of tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: Limiting CO2 laser passes and ending with Er:YAG produces less collagen injury, less thermal necrosis, and more robust epithelial and dermal fibrous tissue regeneration. CO2 followed by Er:YAG has similar thermal necrosis and collagen injury as Er:YAG alone, presumably due to Er:YAG removal of CO2 induced thermal injury.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients underwent laser treatment to four left preauricular sites 7 days prior to rhytidectomy as follows: CO2 alone, CO2/Er:YAG, Er:YAG alone, and Er:YAG/CO2. The right preauricular area was identically treated 1 hour prior to rhytidectomy. Laser treated skin was excised during rhytidectomy and was evaluated histopathologically in a blinded manner.
RESULTS: After 7 days, all groups were reepithelialized and showed equal neo-collagen formation. After 7 days, CO2/Er:YAG and Er:YAG alone had the least collagen injury and thickest epidermis and papillary dermis of all groups. Specimens lased 1 hour prior to excision showed the least collagen injury and thermal necrosis when treated with CO2/Er:YAG and Er:YAG alone. Four passes with CO2 removed 250 microm of tissue, while eight passes with the Er:YAG removed 160 microm of tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: Limiting CO2 laser passes and ending with Er:YAG produces less collagen injury, less thermal necrosis, and more robust epithelial and dermal fibrous tissue regeneration. CO2 followed by Er:YAG has similar thermal necrosis and collagen injury as Er:YAG alone, presumably due to Er:YAG removal of CO2 induced thermal injury.