MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2166/wst.2014.185

Медицинская библиотека · Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2014

Comparison of sludge treatment by O3 and O3/H2O2.

Yuxin Zhao, Liang Wang, Helong Yu, Baojun Jiang, Jinming Jiang

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This work focuses on the comparison of sludge decomposition caused by ozone (O3) alone and by ozone/hydrogen peroxide (O3/H2O2). The content of carbonaceous organic materials, nitrogenous compounds and phosphoric substances in sludge supernatant were measured. The release of soluble chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) caused by O3/H2O2 treatment were more than by O3 alone. As a result, it can be concluded that the efficiency of sludge breakup in O3/H2O2 was better than that in O3 alone. However, a peak appeared in both systems for the biodegradable substances such as carbohydrate. Carbohydrate could be used as the carbon source for denitrification, and the releasing of TN and TP may become an additional burden for a subsequent biological system. So, it was of benefit for the enhancement of cryptic growth and cost reduction by raising and maintaining the content of biodegradable substance and reducing the concentrations of the nitrogenous and phosphoric substances as far as possible. Therefore, sludge treated by O3/H2O2 with lower O3 dose would be more suitable than O3 alone.

Для цитирования: Yuxin Zhao, Liang Wang, Helong Yu, Baojun Jiang, Jinming Jiang. Comparison of sludge treatment by O3 and O3/H2O2.. Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. 2014. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2014.185.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.