DOI 10.1186/s12879-023-08127-w
Concordance in pathogen identification at the upper and lower respiratory tract of children with severe pneumonia.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Nasopharyngeal swabs are taken to determine the causative agent of community acquired pneumonia (CAP), while the reliability of upper respiratory tract sampling as a proxy for lower respiratory tract infections is still unclear.
METHODS
Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples and clinical data were collected from 153 hospitalized children between 3 months and 14 years of age with severe CAP, enrolled from March to June 2019. Written informed consent for the storage and use of the samples for further studies was obtained from the parents or caregivers. Putative pathogens were detected using a sensitive, high-throughput GeXP-based multiplex PCR and qPCR.
RESULTS
The same bacterial species in paired samples were found in 29 (23.4%) and the same viral species in 52 (27.5%) of the patients. moderate concordance was found for Mycoplasma pneumoniae (ĸ=0.64), followed by Haemophilus influenzae (ĸ=0.42). The strongest discordance was observed for human adenovirus and also for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the latter was exclusively detected in BAL samples. In the adenovirus cases strong concordance was associated with high viral loads in the NP swabs.
CONCLUSION
The variation in concordance in pathogen detection in the upper and lower respiratory tract of children with severe pneumonia is generally high but varies depending on the species. Novel and impactful insights are the concordance between NP and BAL detection for M. pneumoniae and H. influenzae and the strong correlation between high adenoviral loads in NP swabs and detection in BAL fluid.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.