Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
Rituximab treatment combined with methylprednisolone pulse therapy and immunosuppressants for childhood steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamei Koichi, Okada Mari, Sato Mai, Fujimaru Takuya, Ogura Masao, Nakayama Makiko, Kaito Hiroshi, Iijima Kazumoto, Ito Shuichi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) with/without intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MPT) constitute the standard treatment for childhood-onset, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). However, some patients fail to achieve remission. We treated SRNS patients resistant to CIs and MPT with additional rituximab combined with MPT and immunosuppressive agents.
METHODS: Ten patients (aged 2-14 years) with CI- and MPT-resistant SRNS were enrolled. Patients were administered rituximab (1-4 doses; 375 mg/m(2)) followed by MPT (30 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone for 3 consecutive days) once every 2-4 weeks until complete remission (CR). We analyzed clinical outcome and safety.
RESULTS: Six patients received a single dose of rituximab, 2 received two doses, and 2 received four doses. Seven patients achieved CR, 1 achieved partial remission, and 2 showed no response. Although 2 patients with no response progressed to end-stage renal failure, 7 patients with CR preserved normal renal function without proteinuria at the last observation. There were two serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional rituximab combined with conventional MPT and immunosuppressive agents is a promising option for overcoming refractory SRNS. Aggressive B cell suppression by rituximab may ameliorate resistance to conventional treatments and a cocktail of other immunosuppressive agents, such as CIs, MMF, mizoribine, may be beneficial. However, as intense immunosuppression may cause serious adverse events, further evaluation is necessary.
METHODS: Ten patients (aged 2-14 years) with CI- and MPT-resistant SRNS were enrolled. Patients were administered rituximab (1-4 doses; 375 mg/m(2)) followed by MPT (30 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone for 3 consecutive days) once every 2-4 weeks until complete remission (CR). We analyzed clinical outcome and safety.
RESULTS: Six patients received a single dose of rituximab, 2 received two doses, and 2 received four doses. Seven patients achieved CR, 1 achieved partial remission, and 2 showed no response. Although 2 patients with no response progressed to end-stage renal failure, 7 patients with CR preserved normal renal function without proteinuria at the last observation. There were two serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional rituximab combined with conventional MPT and immunosuppressive agents is a promising option for overcoming refractory SRNS. Aggressive B cell suppression by rituximab may ameliorate resistance to conventional treatments and a cocktail of other immunosuppressive agents, such as CIs, MMF, mizoribine, may be beneficial. However, as intense immunosuppression may cause serious adverse events, further evaluation is necessary.