Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2024
Efficacy and safety of bemiparin as treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in the elderly.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ena Javier, Stanimirova-Nikolova Silvena, Iborra-Devesa Maria, Raya-Santos Carmen, Serra-Manclus Aurora, Seco-Hanselaar Ignacio J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: As the elderly population continues to grow worldwide, it becomes crucial to explore safe and effective treatment options to manage venous thromboembolic disease in this vulnerable demographic group.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort study (January 2017-December 2021) to analyse the efficacy and safety of bemiparin as a treatment for venous thromboembolic disease in 223 patients. We compared patients aged ≥65 years (elderly; n = 153) with patients aged less than 65 years (adults; n = 70) for a combined end point of death, recurrent thromboembolism, and major bleeding at 30 days.
RESULTS: Elderly (mean age 79 ± 7.7 years) and adult patients (mean age 51.5 ± 11.6 years) received similar bemiparin doses 8470 ± 2362 International units (IU)/d versus 8754 ± 1593 IU/d, during a similar median [Interquartile range] period of 28 [9-118] versus 30 [10-90] days, respectively. At 30-day follow up a total of 24 elderly patients (15.7%), reached at least one of the end points, as compared with six adult patients (8.6%) (absolute difference 7.1%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -1.6 to 15.8). Recurrence of venous thromboembolic disease occurred in five elderly patients (3.3%) and in five adult patients (7.1%) (absolute difference -3.9%; 95% CI, -10.5 to 2.8). There were two episodes of major bleeding each in elderly (1.3%) and adult (2.9%) patients (absolute difference -1.6%; 95% CI, -5.8 to 2.7).
CONCLUSION: Bemiparin showed a similar efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in elderly and adult patients.
METHODS: We carried out a retrospective cohort study (January 2017-December 2021) to analyse the efficacy and safety of bemiparin as a treatment for venous thromboembolic disease in 223 patients. We compared patients aged ≥65 years (elderly; n = 153) with patients aged less than 65 years (adults; n = 70) for a combined end point of death, recurrent thromboembolism, and major bleeding at 30 days.
RESULTS: Elderly (mean age 79 ± 7.7 years) and adult patients (mean age 51.5 ± 11.6 years) received similar bemiparin doses 8470 ± 2362 International units (IU)/d versus 8754 ± 1593 IU/d, during a similar median [Interquartile range] period of 28 [9-118] versus 30 [10-90] days, respectively. At 30-day follow up a total of 24 elderly patients (15.7%), reached at least one of the end points, as compared with six adult patients (8.6%) (absolute difference 7.1%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], -1.6 to 15.8). Recurrence of venous thromboembolic disease occurred in five elderly patients (3.3%) and in five adult patients (7.1%) (absolute difference -3.9%; 95% CI, -10.5 to 2.8). There were two episodes of major bleeding each in elderly (1.3%) and adult (2.9%) patients (absolute difference -1.6%; 95% CI, -5.8 to 2.7).
CONCLUSION: Bemiparin showed a similar efficacy and safety profile in the treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in elderly and adult patients.