MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2005

The emergence of west nile virus during a large outbreak in Illinois in 2002.

Huhn Gregory D, Austin Connie, Langkop Carl, Kelly Kate, Lucht Roland, Lampman Richard, Novak Robert, Haramis Linn, Boker Rosemary, Smith Stephanie, Chudoba Maria, Gerber Susan, Conover Craig, Dworkin Mark S

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In 2002, the world's largest outbreak of neuroinvasive West Nile virus (WNV) disease occurred. Illinois reported 21% of the total cases in the United States, the most among all states. The epidemiology of WNV in Illinois in 2002 was examined to determine factors associated with severe disease and death. A total of 884 cases were identified and there were 66 deaths. The overall attack rate of WNV infection was 7.1 per 100,000 population and this increased with age. The median ages of patients and patients who died were 56 and 78 years, respectively. Among patients who died, 91% were diagnosed with encephalitis and the case-fatality rate for patients with encephalitis was 18.6%. Patients more than 50 years old had a significantly higher risk of being reported with encephalitis (relative risk [RR] = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.6-4.3%) and death (RR = 22.3, 95% CI = 5.5-90.4%). Clinicians evaluating elderly patients with WNV infection should assess patients closely for progression of disease.

Для цитирования: Huhn Gregory D, Austin Connie, Langkop Carl, Kelly Kate, Lucht Roland, Lampman Richard, Novak Robert, Haramis Linn, Boker Rosemary, Smith Stephanie, Chudoba Maria, Gerber Susan, Conover Craig, Dworkin Mark S. The emergence of west nile virus during a large outbreak in Illinois in 2002.. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.