Journal of immunological methods · 2006
A flow cytometric comparison of Indo-1 to fluo-3 and Fura Red excited with low power lasers for detecting Ca(2+) flux.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bailey Sheree, Macardle Peter J
Аннотация
Indo-1 and high-power water-cooled lasers have been the standard for flow cytometric based Ca(2+) flux measurements. With advances in technology and the availability of low-power air-cooled lasers, there is interest in alternative protocols. Here, we have compared Indo-1 with the combination of fluo-3 and Fura Red calcium indicator dyes using low-power air-cooled lasers as the excitation source. The reagents were examined in parallel to detect Ca(2+) flux in peripheral blood T lymphocytes and in a T lymphoblastoid cell line. Ca(2+) flux was detected with a FACSVantage SE equipped with an Omnichrome Series 74 Helium-Cadmium, or a Spectra Physics 177-G1202 Argon ion air-cooled laser. Following determination of optimal loading conditions, Ca(2+) flux was examined in response to membrane receptor stimulation or intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization. Dose dependent Ca(2+) flux to anti-CD3 and thapsigargin was detected with either Indo-1 or with fluo-3 and Fura Red. The profile of the Ca(2+) flux detected by Indo-1 or with fluo-3 and Fura Red appeared similar, with the combination of fluo-3 and Fura Red more sensitive under the particular test conditions. The results clearly demonstrated that Indo-1 could be usefully excited with a low-power air-cooled laser. The alternative use of fluo-3 and Fura Red does not require the availability of a UV capable laser and produced equivalent data.