Evaluation of an aPTT guided versus a multimodal heparin monitoring approach in patients on extra corporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective cohort study.

IntroductionBleeding and thrombotic complications are common in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients and are associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The optimal anticoagulation monitoring protocol in these patients is unknown. This study aims to compare the incidence of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications before and after a protocol change. In addition, the association between hemostatic complications, coagulation tests and risk factors is evaluated.MethodsThis is a retrospective single center cohort study of adult ECMO patients. We collected demographics, ECMO parameters and coagulation test results. Outcomes of the aPTT guided and multimodal protocol, including aPTT, anti-Xa assay and rotational thromboelastometry were compared and the association between coagulation tests, risk factors and hemostatic complications was determined using a logistic regression analysis for repeated measurements.ResultsIn total, 250 patients were included, 138 in the aPTT protocol and 112 in the multimodal protocol. The incidence of thrombosis (aPTT: 14%; multimodal: 12%) and bleeding (aPTT: 36%; multimodal: 40%), did not significantly differ between protocols. In the aPTT guided protocol, the aPTT was associated with thrombosis (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.015; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.004-1.027). In both protocols, surgical interventions were risk factors for bleeding and thrombotic complications (aPTT: OR 93.2, CI 39.9-217.6; multimodal OR 17.5, CI 6.5-46.9).DiscussionThe incidence of hemostatic complications was similar between both protocols and surgical interventions were a risk factor for hemostatic complications. Results from this study help to elucidate the role of coagulation tests and risk factors in predicting hemostatic complications in patients undergoing ECMO support.