The Laryngoscope · 2021
Efficacy of Topical Epinephrine in Tympanoplasty.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
List Marna A, Dirain Carolyn O, Haberman Rex S, Antonelli Patrick J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To compare the hemostatic effects of commonly used concentrations of topical epinephrine in tympanoplasty.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
METHODS: Patients undergoing tympanoplasty were randomized to receive topical epinephrine at 1:1,000 or 1:10,000. With the investigators blinded, hemostasis was assessed with a modified Boezaart scale. Vasoconstriction was measured by laser Doppler. Blood pressure and pulse were tracked.
RESULTS: Thirty patients, 4 to 84 years old, were studied, with 15 patients per group. Boezaart scores dropped a mean of 67% and 62% with 1:1,000 and 1:10,000, respectively (P = .44). Capillary blood flow decreased a mean of 50.4% and 50.9% with 1:1,000 and 1:10,000, respectively (P = .95). The mean change in heart rate and mean arterial pressure after topical epinephrine exposure were -4.9 and -0.73 beats per minute (P = .15), and -0.60 and -0.73 mmHg (P = .96) for 1:1,000 and 1:10,000 respectively. No adverse events occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Topical epinephrine at 1:10,000 has hemostatic efficacy comparable to 1:1,000 in tympanoplasty. Although both concentrations appear safe, use of topical epinephrine 1:10,000 should be considered over 1:1,000 to minimize the potential for adverse events.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 131:2319-2322, 2021.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
METHODS: Patients undergoing tympanoplasty were randomized to receive topical epinephrine at 1:1,000 or 1:10,000. With the investigators blinded, hemostasis was assessed with a modified Boezaart scale. Vasoconstriction was measured by laser Doppler. Blood pressure and pulse were tracked.
RESULTS: Thirty patients, 4 to 84 years old, were studied, with 15 patients per group. Boezaart scores dropped a mean of 67% and 62% with 1:1,000 and 1:10,000, respectively (P = .44). Capillary blood flow decreased a mean of 50.4% and 50.9% with 1:1,000 and 1:10,000, respectively (P = .95). The mean change in heart rate and mean arterial pressure after topical epinephrine exposure were -4.9 and -0.73 beats per minute (P = .15), and -0.60 and -0.73 mmHg (P = .96) for 1:1,000 and 1:10,000 respectively. No adverse events occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Topical epinephrine at 1:10,000 has hemostatic efficacy comparable to 1:1,000 in tympanoplasty. Although both concentrations appear safe, use of topical epinephrine 1:10,000 should be considered over 1:1,000 to minimize the potential for adverse events.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 131:2319-2322, 2021.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Administration, TopicalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood PressureChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugEpinephrineFemaleHeart RateHemostasis, SurgicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTympanoplastyVasoconstrictionVasoconstrictor AgentsYoung Adult