MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1077559506292287

Медицинская библиотека · Child maltreatment · 2006

Pediatrician characteristics associated with child abuse identification and reporting: results from a national survey of pediatricians.

Flaherty Emalee G, Sege Robert, Price Lori Lyn, Christoffel Katherine Kaufer, Norton David P, O'Connor Karen G

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Pediatrician experience with child protective services (CPS) and factors associated with identifying and reporting suspected child physical abuse were examined by a survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Respondents provided information about their demographics and experience, attitudes and practices with child abuse. They indicated their diagnosis and management of a child in a purposely ambiguous clinical vignette. Pediatricians who had received recent child abuse education were more confident in their ability to identify and manage child abuse. High confidence in ability to manage child abuse and positive attitude about domestic violence screening and value of anticipatory guidance predicted that pediatricians would have high suspicion that the child in the vignette was abused and that they would report the child to CPS. Future efforts to improve medical intervention in child abuse should focus on physician attitudes and experience, as well as cognitive factors.

Для цитирования: Flaherty Emalee G, Sege Robert, Price Lori Lyn, Christoffel Katherine Kaufer, Norton David P, O'Connor Karen G. Pediatrician characteristics associated with child abuse identification and reporting: results from a national survey of pediatricians.. Child maltreatment. 2006. DOI: 10.1177/1077559506292287.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.