Ophthalmic Insert versus Eye Drops for Mydriasis in Neonates: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND

Eye drop treatment routinely used to obtain mydriasis prior to fundoscopy in neonates requires repeated instillations of mydriatic agents that can lead to systemic side effects.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the mydriatic efficacy and tolerance of administration of phenylephrine and tropicamide via the ophthalmic insert Mydriasert® versus standard eye drop treatment in neonates.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-blinded, noninferiority study, 80 hospitalized neonates (age < 18 months) requiring bilateral fundus examination were randomized to receive eye drops (repeated instillations of 2.5% phenylephrine and 0.5% tropicamide) or the insert. The primary outcome was mydriasis suitable for fundoscopy 75 min after mydriatic agent introduction (T75).

RESULTS

Mydriasis was successfully achieved in both eyes at T75 in 97.5% (n = 39/40) of the insert group patients versus 90% (n = 36/40) receiving eye drops (between-group difference 7.5%, demonstrating noninferiority). Mydriasis remained stable in 60.0% of patients (n = 24/40) in the insert group versus 15% (n = 6/40) in the eye drop group (p < 0.0001). The insert group required fewer nursing interventions than the eye drop group (p = 0.0001). Mean blood pressure were significantly higher in the insert versus the eye drop group (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, respectively); mean heart rate was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.37). In the insert group, 2 patients reported an adverse event (bradycardia, n = 1, and gastroesophageal reflux, n = 1; both appeared to be related to neonate pathology).

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of mydriasis achieved with Mydriasert® was noninferior to that obtained with eye drops. The insert appears to be safe to use in neonates without a history of increased vagal tone or gastrointestinal reflux.