Resuscitation · 2005
Open-chest CPR improves survival and neurologic outcome following cardiac arrest.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Benson Don M, O'Neil Brian, Kakish Edward, Erpelding John, Alousi Sarah, Mason Reginald, Piper David, Rafols Jose
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if 15 min of open-chest cardiac massage (OC-CPR) versus closed-chest compressions (CC-CPR) improves 72-h survival and neurologic outcome (behavioral and histologic) after 5 min of untreated cardiac arrest.
METHODS: Mongrel dogs were anesthetized and instrumented. Cardiac arrest was induced by KCl injection and after a 5-min period of non-intervention, dogs were randomized to receive either CC-CPR (N = 7) or OC-CPR (N = 5) performed for 15 min. The dogs were then resuscitated and physiologic data was recorded. Surviving dogs were scored at 72 h using canine neurodeficit score of Safar et al. (NDS; 0 = behaviorally normal, 500 = brain death). Dogs that could not be resuscitated or died before 72 h were assigned a score of 500. Brain histology was performed on all survivors.
RESULTS: All OC-CPR dogs were successfully resuscitated and were behaviorally normal at 72 h (NDS = 0). Histology in OC-CPR dogs showed little to no injury. Only three out of the seven CC-CPR dogs survived to 72 h. Of the survivors, one dog exhibited minor ataxia (NDS = 15), and two had incapacitating deficits (both NDS = 180). Two dogs died within 24 h after extubation, and one could not be resuscitated and the other could not be weaned from the ventilator (each NDS = 500). Histology of the CC-CPR survivors revealed moderate to severe lesions. NDS between groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0079).
CONCLUSION: In our canine model of cardiac arrest, OC-CPR significantly improved 72-h survival and neurologic outcome when compared to CC-CPR.
METHODS: Mongrel dogs were anesthetized and instrumented. Cardiac arrest was induced by KCl injection and after a 5-min period of non-intervention, dogs were randomized to receive either CC-CPR (N = 7) or OC-CPR (N = 5) performed for 15 min. The dogs were then resuscitated and physiologic data was recorded. Surviving dogs were scored at 72 h using canine neurodeficit score of Safar et al. (NDS; 0 = behaviorally normal, 500 = brain death). Dogs that could not be resuscitated or died before 72 h were assigned a score of 500. Brain histology was performed on all survivors.
RESULTS: All OC-CPR dogs were successfully resuscitated and were behaviorally normal at 72 h (NDS = 0). Histology in OC-CPR dogs showed little to no injury. Only three out of the seven CC-CPR dogs survived to 72 h. Of the survivors, one dog exhibited minor ataxia (NDS = 15), and two had incapacitating deficits (both NDS = 180). Two dogs died within 24 h after extubation, and one could not be resuscitated and the other could not be weaned from the ventilator (each NDS = 500). Histology of the CC-CPR survivors revealed moderate to severe lesions. NDS between groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0079).
CONCLUSION: In our canine model of cardiac arrest, OC-CPR significantly improved 72-h survival and neurologic outcome when compared to CC-CPR.