MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1292/jvms.18-0297

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2018

Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus).

Ahmad Ali Anwar, Wahab Norsham Abd, Yeo Clara Wenjing, Oh Serena Jocelyn Wai Yin, Chen Hui Cheng

Clinical Trial, VeterinaryСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Forty rescued common palm civets were anesthetized. Twenty animals received intramuscular injections of alfaxalone 5 mg/kg and medetomidine 0.05 mg/kg (A-M group), whereas twenty animals received 5 mg/kg of tiletamine and zolazepam (T-Z group). The A-M group was reversed with atipamazole 0.25 mg/kg. There were no significant differences in the time from anesthetic injection to induction and intubation between the A-M and T-Z groups. The time from the injection of reversal in the A-M group and the time from cessation of isoflurane in the T-Z group to extubation, first response to recovery and ambulation were longer (P<0.05) in the T-Z group. The T-Z group recorded lower (P<0.05) rectal temperatures compared to the A-M group. This study showed that both drug combinations can be used effectively for the immobilization of civets. The A-M combination provided better anesthetic depth, but with higher incidence of bradycardia and hypoxemia. The recovery time was reduced significantly as atipamezole was used as a reversal agent in the A-M combination.

Для цитирования: Ahmad Ali Anwar, Wahab Norsham Abd, Yeo Clara Wenjing, Oh Serena Jocelyn Wai Yin, Chen Hui Cheng. Comparison of alfaxalone-medetomidine and tiletamine-zolazepam in rescued common palm civets (Paradoxurus musangus).. The Journal of veterinary medical science. 2018. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.18-0297.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.