MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.11.007

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2006

Airway reconstruction in children with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.

Boston Mark, Rutter Michael, Myer Charles M, Cotton Robin T

Клинический случайСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine if children with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis were at increased risk of complications due to their disease following major airway reconstruction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our airway surgery database and the medical records of all children diagnosed with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis who were evaluated at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center between January 1998 and August 2003. All patients with active airway papillomas or a history of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis who underwent open airway reconstruction at our institution were included in the study.

RESULTS

Seven children with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis underwent major airway reconstruction. Six children had tracheotomies and five are now decannulated following their airway reconstruction. Five children had active papillomas at the time of surgery and none had significant worsening of their papillomas following their procedures. Two patients in remission underwent airway reconstruction without recurrence of their papillomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Major airway reconstruction can be safely performed in children with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.

Для цитирования: Boston Mark, Rutter Michael, Myer Charles M, Cotton Robin T. Airway reconstruction in children with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.11.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.