MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/382880

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2004

Incidence of carbapenem-associated allergic-type reactions among patients with versus patients without a reported penicillin allergy.

Prescott William A, DePestel Daryl D, Ellis Jeffrey J, Regal Randolph E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

This retrospective analysis sought to determine the comparative incidence of cross-reactivity associated with carbapenem antibiotic treatment among patients with versus those without penicillin allergy. We sought to determine whether the incidence of cross-reactivity is different between imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem. A total of 211 patients were treated with a carbapenem antibiotic. Included were 100 patients with and 111 patients without a documented or reported penicillin allergy. Within each group, subgroups of penicillin-allergic and penicillin-nonallergic patients were balanced equally between imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem. The incidence of patients with a reported or documented penicillin allergy experiencing an allergic-type reaction to a carbapenem was 11%, which is 5.2 times greater than the risk in patients who were reportedly not allergic to penicillin (P=.024). No difference in the occurrence of allergic-type reactions was observed between the 2 carbapenems.

Для цитирования: Prescott William A, DePestel Daryl D, Ellis Jeffrey J, Regal Randolph E. Incidence of carbapenem-associated allergic-type reactions among patients with versus patients without a reported penicillin allergy.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2004. DOI: 10.1086/382880.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.