MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.smj.0000157561.22406.f7

Медицинская библиотека · Southern medical journal · 2005

Availability and perceived competence of pediatricians to serve as child protection team medical consultants: a survey of practicing pediatricians.

Arnold Donald H, Spiro David M, Nichols Michele Holloway, King William D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of multidisciplinary child protection teams has been demonstrated. This study is an attempt to assess the level of this commitment and the perceived competence of primary care pediatricians to provide this service.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey was mailed to primary care pediatricians practicing in the state of Alabama.

RESULTS

Among respondents who did not consider themselves competent to conduct sexual abuse or physical abuse examinations, 27% and 19%, respectively, were called on to conduct such examinations. Approximately half of respondents expressed a willingness to serve as consultants under a time commitment obligation of less than 2 hours per week or 1 day per month, and under a reimbursement provision of $200 per examination or less. Respondents recognized a need for, and expressed a desire for, more training in this area.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary care pediatricians are willing to serve as multidisciplinary child protection team medical consultants if provided appropriate training and support.

Для цитирования: Arnold Donald H, Spiro David M, Nichols Michele Holloway, King William D. Availability and perceived competence of pediatricians to serve as child protection team medical consultants: a survey of practicing pediatricians.. Southern medical journal. 2005. DOI: 10.1097/01.smj.0000157561.22406.f7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.