The Journal of surgical research · 2020
Computed Tomography for Pediatric Pelvic Fractures in Pediatric Versus Adult Trauma Centers.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ali Ayman, Tatum Danielle, Jones Glenn, Guidry Chrissy, McGrew Patrick, Schroll Rebecca, Harris Charles, Duchesne Juan, Taghavi Sharven
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pediatric pelvic fractures are a significant source of morbidity for children in the United States. In the era of specialized care, the relationship between trauma center designation and outcomes remains unknown. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient outcomes when treated at adult trauma centers (ATCs), pediatric trauma centers (PTCs), or dual trauma centers (DTCs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the National Trauma Data Bank to identify pediatric (≤14 y) patients suffering pelvic fractures in 2013-2015. DTCs were defined as centers with level I or II trauma designation for both pediatric and adult care. Primary outcomes included mortality, complications, and computed tomography (CT) utilization.
RESULTS: There were 4260 patients who met study criteria. Of these, 1290 (22%) were treated at ATCs, 1332 (30%) at PTCs, and 2120 (48%) at DTCs. Pediatric patients treated at ATCs were more likely to suffer a complication or receive a CT scan. On multivariate analysis, patients treated at PTCs and DTCs were significantly less likely to have a recorded complication or receive head, thoracic, or whole-body CT scans compared with ATCs. DTCs, but not PTCs, used fewer abdominal CT scans. Mortality rates were not predicted by center designation.
CONCLUSIONS: For pediatric pelvic fractures, centers with pediatric trauma designation (PTCs and DTCs) appear to have better outcomes despite significantly less use of CT scans. Further studies are needed to determine optimal management of pediatric pelvic fractures while minimizing exposure to ionizing radiation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Retrospective.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the National Trauma Data Bank to identify pediatric (≤14 y) patients suffering pelvic fractures in 2013-2015. DTCs were defined as centers with level I or II trauma designation for both pediatric and adult care. Primary outcomes included mortality, complications, and computed tomography (CT) utilization.
RESULTS: There were 4260 patients who met study criteria. Of these, 1290 (22%) were treated at ATCs, 1332 (30%) at PTCs, and 2120 (48%) at DTCs. Pediatric patients treated at ATCs were more likely to suffer a complication or receive a CT scan. On multivariate analysis, patients treated at PTCs and DTCs were significantly less likely to have a recorded complication or receive head, thoracic, or whole-body CT scans compared with ATCs. DTCs, but not PTCs, used fewer abdominal CT scans. Mortality rates were not predicted by center designation.
CONCLUSIONS: For pediatric pelvic fractures, centers with pediatric trauma designation (PTCs and DTCs) appear to have better outcomes despite significantly less use of CT scans. Further studies are needed to determine optimal management of pediatric pelvic fractures while minimizing exposure to ionizing radiation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Retrospective.