American journal of infection control · 2011
Group A rotavirus detection on environmental surfaces in a hospital intensive care unit.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ganime Ana Carolina, Carvalho-Costa Filipe A, Mendonça Marcos Cesar L, Vieira Carmen B, Santos Marisa, Costa Filho Rubens, Miagostovich Marize P, Leite José Paulo G
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Environmental surfaces can play a role in the spread of pathogens, such as enteric viruses, within a hospital. This study assessed the level of contamination of group A rotavirus (RV-A) on environmental surfaces samples from an adult intensive care unit in a hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
METHODS: A total of 504 environmental surface samples were obtained from multiple sites in the intensive care unit, including flushing buttons, telephones, and alcohol gel supports. Nested and quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used to detect and quantify RV-A levels through partial amplification of VP6 and NSP3 genes, respectively, and the viability of the viruses detected was assessed by MA-104 cell integrated cell culture/RT-PCR.
RESULTS: RV-A was detected by nested RT-PCR in 14% of the samples (73 of 504), with viral loads ranging from 3.4 genomic copies/mL to 2.9 × 10(3) genomic copies/mL. The nucleotide sequence of the amplicons obtained from nested RT-PCR confirmed that the positive samples were RV-A. Moreover, 3 of 10 strains investigated demonstrated viability by integrated cell culture/RT-PCR.
CONCLUSION: The detection of RV-A on environmental surface samples indicates a need for improvements to hospital cleaning procedures to reduce viral contamination, and suggests, as reported previously, that RV-A can be used as a biomarker to assess contamination in hospitals.
METHODS: A total of 504 environmental surface samples were obtained from multiple sites in the intensive care unit, including flushing buttons, telephones, and alcohol gel supports. Nested and quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used to detect and quantify RV-A levels through partial amplification of VP6 and NSP3 genes, respectively, and the viability of the viruses detected was assessed by MA-104 cell integrated cell culture/RT-PCR.
RESULTS: RV-A was detected by nested RT-PCR in 14% of the samples (73 of 504), with viral loads ranging from 3.4 genomic copies/mL to 2.9 × 10(3) genomic copies/mL. The nucleotide sequence of the amplicons obtained from nested RT-PCR confirmed that the positive samples were RV-A. Moreover, 3 of 10 strains investigated demonstrated viability by integrated cell culture/RT-PCR.
CONCLUSION: The detection of RV-A on environmental surface samples indicates a need for improvements to hospital cleaning procedures to reduce viral contamination, and suggests, as reported previously, that RV-A can be used as a biomarker to assess contamination in hospitals.