Lin chuang er bi yan hou ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology · 2000
[Comparison of four techniques in the treatment of little's area epistaxis].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li B N, Tong A B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To probe the most effective technique in the treatment of little's area epistaxis.
METHOD: 851 patients were separately treated with four techniques. The effects of sclerosant mucosa injection, cryotherapy, CO2 laser and chemical cautery in the treatment of epistaxis were compared.
RESULT: The effective rate of sclerosant mucosa injection is 92.4%, CO2 laser 75.8%, Cryotherapy 76.4%, Chemical cautery 73.8%. No side effect was found.
CONCLUSION: Sclerosant mucosa injection is superior to the others.
METHOD: 851 patients were separately treated with four techniques. The effects of sclerosant mucosa injection, cryotherapy, CO2 laser and chemical cautery in the treatment of epistaxis were compared.
RESULT: The effective rate of sclerosant mucosa injection is 92.4%, CO2 laser 75.8%, Cryotherapy 76.4%, Chemical cautery 73.8%. No side effect was found.
CONCLUSION: Sclerosant mucosa injection is superior to the others.