DOI 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.10.003
Findings of routine nocturnal polysomnography in children with Down syndrome: a retrospective cohort study.
Аннотация
STUDY
OBJECTIVE
Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at risk for sleep disorders including; obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although OSA is diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG), the practicality of PSG in DS is questionable. Further, OSA treatment efficacy in DS is largely unknown given the challenges of PSG. Our aims were to review (i) the feasibility of PSG, and (ii) the efficacy (improvement in obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI)) of OSA treatment using follow-up PSG in DS.
METHODS
Retrospective review of patients aged <21 years with DS who underwent PSG from October 2016 to June 2019. Successful PSG was determined using total sleep time (TST). PSG following treatment with adenotonsillectomy (AT) or positive airway pressure (PAP) was evaluated and compared to pre-treatment.
RESULTS
Among 248 patients with DS, only 11(4.4%) had unsuccessful PSG (TST<1h). Of the 237 successful studies (age: 7.9 ± 0.3y), average TST and sleep efficiency was 5.6 ± 0.1h and 79.5 ± 1.3%. 41 had post-AT PSG and 11(27%) achieved OSA cure (OAHI<2) with all demonstrating improved SE (p = 0.01) and OAHI (p = 0.0003). Multivariate analysis revealed only age was predictive (p = 0.003) of residual OSA post-AT. Of 24 children who underwent PAP titration, 20(83%) tolerated titration with improved OAHI (p = 0.01), however, no significant improvements in SE were observed.
CONCLUSIONS
In a large cohort of DS children, PSG was well tolerated. Following AT or PAP therapy, post treatment PSG confirmed efficacy, although residual OSA was identified. PSG is thus both feasible and useful in identifying OSA, OSA treatment response and should guide in decision making in children with DS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.