MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01807.x

Медицинская библиотека · Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2005

Teenage asthma after severe infantile bronchiolitis or pneumonia.

Hyvärinen Mari, Piippo-Savolainen Eija, Korhonen Kaj, Korppi Matti

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate asthma at >13 y of age in children with infantile bronchiolitis or pneumonia.

METHODS

In 1981-1982, 127 children at <2 y of age were hospitalized for bronchiolitis (n = 81) or pneumonia (n = 46). Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, eosinophilia and markers of atopy were assessed and recorded on admission. At a median age of 14.9 y, atopic and asthmatic symptoms were screened by a written questionnaire in 98/127 (77%) study subjects.

RESULTS

Asthma was present, according to two definitions, in 14% to 23% in the original bronchiolitis and in 12% to 15% in the original pneumonia group. The figures were 8% to 17% in the RSV infection and 16% to 23% in the non-RSV infection group. Early asthma-predictive factors were repeated wheezing, atopic dermatitis and elevated blood eosinophils. All but one of the teenage asthmatics had allergic rhinitis.

CONCLUSION

An increased risk for asthma persists until the teenage period after bronchiolitis and pneumonia in infancy. Both early and later atopy were significant risk factors. The present study was unable to demonstrate the association between early RSV infection and teenage asthma.

Для цитирования: Hyvärinen Mari, Piippo-Savolainen Eija, Korhonen Kaj, Korppi Matti. Teenage asthma after severe infantile bronchiolitis or pneumonia.. Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). 2005. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01807.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.