The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2005
The use of synthetic bedding in children. Do strategies of change influence associations with asthma?
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Behrens Thomas, Maziak Wasim, Weiland Stephan K, Siebert Edith, Rzehak Peter, Keil Ulrich
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological data suggest in contrast to clinical recommendations a negative effect of synthetic bedding on asthma and respiratory symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of bedding filled with synthetic material on the risk of asthma and respiratory symptoms in 6- to 7-year-old children, taking into account allergy-related change of bedding material.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the ISAAC Phase III cross-sectional survey (1999/2000) in Münster, Germany. Data were collected by parental report from representative school-based samples of 6- to 7-year old children (n = 3,529). We calculated prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the association between respiratory symptoms suggestive of asthma and synthetic pillows and blankets and adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: In the preliminary analyses, synthetic pillows and synthetic blankets were positively associated with the studied respiratory outcomes. For example, a high number of wheezing attacks was positively associated with synthetic pillows (PR = 4.44; 95% CI 2.84-6.94) and synthetic blankets (PR = 3.80; 95% CI 2.48-5.82). However, in the restricted analysis, excluding participants reporting allergy-related change of bedding (pillows n = 440; blankets n = 437), the positive associations disappeared for all studied outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that allergy-related choice of bedding is an important factor in the assessment of the relation between synthetic bedding and asthma symptoms. Ignoring those changes can lead to false-positive risk estimates. Prospective studies that allow to disentangle the temporal sequence of disease, exposure, and change of bedding should help to further clarify this issue.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of bedding filled with synthetic material on the risk of asthma and respiratory symptoms in 6- to 7-year-old children, taking into account allergy-related change of bedding material.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the ISAAC Phase III cross-sectional survey (1999/2000) in Münster, Germany. Data were collected by parental report from representative school-based samples of 6- to 7-year old children (n = 3,529). We calculated prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals for the association between respiratory symptoms suggestive of asthma and synthetic pillows and blankets and adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: In the preliminary analyses, synthetic pillows and synthetic blankets were positively associated with the studied respiratory outcomes. For example, a high number of wheezing attacks was positively associated with synthetic pillows (PR = 4.44; 95% CI 2.84-6.94) and synthetic blankets (PR = 3.80; 95% CI 2.48-5.82). However, in the restricted analysis, excluding participants reporting allergy-related change of bedding (pillows n = 440; blankets n = 437), the positive associations disappeared for all studied outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that allergy-related choice of bedding is an important factor in the assessment of the relation between synthetic bedding and asthma symptoms. Ignoring those changes can lead to false-positive risk estimates. Prospective studies that allow to disentangle the temporal sequence of disease, exposure, and change of bedding should help to further clarify this issue.