DOI 10.7754/clin.lab.2019.190420
Multicenter Evaluation of the Implementation Status of Laboratory Tests in Korea and the Potential Usefulness of a Multiplex PCR Assay in Patients with Suspected Central Nervous System Infections.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The rapid diagnosis and treatment of central nervous system (CNS) infections are critical to minimizing morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the implementation status of laboratory tests in patients with suspected CNS infection, and the potential usefulness of a multiplex PCR assay for rapid and simultaneous detection in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 14 targets capable of causing CNS infections.
METHODS
The study was conducted at 5 hospitals located in Daegu and Gyeongju over a period of 6 months. A total of 140 patients with suspected CNS infection were included. CSF samples were tested for 6 bacteria, 7 viruses, and 1 yeast using multiplex PCR (FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel, BioFire Diagnostics/Biomerieux, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) and conventional diagnostic testing including chemistry tests, cell count, bacterial culture, antigen detection assay, and pathogen-specific PCR.
RESULTS
The five conventional tests most commonly performed were the chemistry and cell count (100%), bacterial culture (94.3%), enterovirus PCR (52.9%), and herpes simplex virus PCR (25.7%). Among the 140 CSF samples, 27 (19.3%) and 42 (30.0%) tested positive by conventional and the FilmArray ME panel testing, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The detection rate of pathogens for CNS infections increased using only one FilmArray test compared to all of the conventional methods actually performed in patients with suspected CNS infection.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.