MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00000433-199512000-00004

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology · 1995

Regional comparisons of child abuse and related variables in the United States.

Coleman M M, Alder M E, Prihoda T J

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The objective of this article is to familiarize the health care professional with 1990 national data on child abuse and to review some of the trends reported in the literature. The United States was divided into Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Data were collected, analyzed, and transformed to calculate the incidence and types of abuse reported by region. Variables of interest were income, marital status, perpetrator, age of victim, and drug use by region. To determine significant differences among regions for each type of abuse and related variable, frequency distributions were calculated and chi-squared tests were used. State data summaries were measured for correlation analysis. The West was highest in reported incidence of child abuse (5.9%) and, specifically, physical abuse (36.7%). California reported 55% of the physical abuse in the West. In all regions, neglect and physical maltreatment were reported more than sexual and emotional abuse. The incidence of neglect in the south (52.8%) was greater than in any other region and did not correlate to income in this region. Early detection of child abuse can aid in preventing fatalities. This information should increase awareness of child abuse and result in an increase in reporting if abuse is suspected.

Для цитирования: Coleman M M, Alder M E, Prihoda T J. Regional comparisons of child abuse and related variables in the United States.. The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology. 1995. DOI: 10.1097/00000433-199512000-00004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.