MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf01405391

Медицинская библиотека · Acta neurochirurgica · 1977

Treatment of intracranial hypertension. Analysis of 105 consecutive, continuous recordings of intracranial pressure.

James H E, Langfitt T W, Kumar V S, Ghostine S Y

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

One hundred and five consecutive recordings of intracranial pressure (ICP) in 95 patients over a three-year period, using a Scott cannula inserted through a burr hole or a twist drill hole into the anterior horn of the lateral ventricle, represent the patient material for this report. The clinical diagnoses were head injury 32, intracranial tumour 31, aneurysm and arteriovenous malformation 18, brain swelling secondary to systemic disease 8, and brain swelling of unknown etiology 6. ICP exceeded 20 mm/Hg in 86 of the recordings (maximum 110 mm/Hg). Hypertonic mannitol was administered 73 times in 48 patients. ICP was reduced 10% or more (mean 52%) in all but three administrations. The effect of hyperventilation was tested in 50 trials in 34 patients. ICP was reduced 10% or more (mean 47%) in 34 trials. The mean time to maximum reduction of ICP was eight minutes, and ICP returned to control almost immediately after cessation of hyperventilation. Hypothermia was studied in 40 trials in 40 patients. ICP was reduced 10% or more (mean 51%) in half the patients. The infection rate was 6.3% in this four-hospital setting, but four of the six infections were in one hospital. If this hospital is excluded, the infection rate is 3.1%.

Для цитирования: James H E, Langfitt T W, Kumar V S, Ghostine S Y. Treatment of intracranial hypertension. Analysis of 105 consecutive, continuous recordings of intracranial pressure.. Acta neurochirurgica. 1977. DOI: 10.1007/bf01405391.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.