MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.06.018

Медицинская библиотека · Microbial pathogenesis · 2016

Anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activity of probiotic bacteria against oral pathogens.

Ben Taheur Fadia, Kouidhi Bochra, Fdhila Kais, Elabed Hamouda, Ben Slama Rihab, Mahdouani Kacem, Bakhrouf Amina, Chaieb Kamel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In this study, three lactic acid bacteria (LAB), isolated from barley, traditional dried meat and fermented olive were characterized and tested for their anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activities against oral bacteria. Our results revealed that the tested LAB were γ-hemolytic and were susceptible to four antibiotics. All the strains were resistant to low pH, bile salt, pepsin and pancreatin. Furthermore, FB2 displayed a high aut-oaggregative phenotype (99.54%) while FF2 exhibited the best co-aggregation rate. Concerning the microbial adhesion to solvent, FB2 was the most hydrophobic strain (data obtained with chloroform and n-hexadecane). In addition Pediococcus pentosaceus FB2 and Lactobacillus brevis FF2 displayed a significant inhibitory effect against Streptococcus salivarius B468 (MIC = 10%). Moreover the selected strains were able to inhibit biofilm formation of Bacillus cereus ATCC14579 (MBIC50 = 28.16%) and S. salivarius B468 (MBIC50 = 42.28%). The selected LAB could be considered as candidate probiotics for further application in functional food and mainly in the prevention of oral diseases.

Для цитирования: Ben Taheur Fadia, Kouidhi Bochra, Fdhila Kais, Elabed Hamouda, Ben Slama Rihab, Mahdouani Kacem, Bakhrouf Amina, Chaieb Kamel. Anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm activity of probiotic bacteria against oral pathogens.. Microbial pathogenesis. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.06.018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.