MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0886260503256654

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of interpersonal violence · 2003

Gender differences in sexual harassment and coercion in college students: developmental, individual, and situational determinants.

Ménard Kim S, Hall Gordon C Nagayama, Phung Amber H, Ghebrial Marian F Erian, Martin Lynette

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Differences in male (N = 148) and female (N = 278) college students' use of sexually harassing and coercive behaviors were investigated. Men were twice as likely to be sexually harassing and 3 times more likely to be sexually coercive as women. Among men, sexual harassment was predicted by child sexual abuse, hostility, adversarial heterosexual beliefs, and alcohol expectancy, with the latter mediating the effects of aggression. Sexual coercion was predicted by adult sexual victimization and alcohol expectancy, with alcohol expectancy again mediating the effect of aggression. Among women, sexual harassment was predicted by adult sexual victimization, adversarial heterosexual beliefs, aggression, and alcohol expectancy, with aggression mediating the effect of adversarial heterosexual beliefs and alcohol expectancy mediating the effect of aggression. Sexual coercion was predicted by a hostile personality, which mediated the effects of both child and adult sexual victimization. These findings suggest both gender similarities and differences in determinants of sexual aggression.

Для цитирования: Ménard Kim S, Hall Gordon C Nagayama, Phung Amber H, Ghebrial Marian F Erian, Martin Lynette. Gender differences in sexual harassment and coercion in college students: developmental, individual, and situational determinants.. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2003. DOI: 10.1177/0886260503256654.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.