MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1023/a:1023084112561

Медицинская библиотека · Child psychiatry and human development · 2003

Gender differences in reactive and proactive aggression.

Connor Daniel F, Steingard Ronald J, Anderson Jennifer J, Melloni Richard H

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of our investigation was to study gender differences in proactive and reactive aggression in a sample of 323 clinically referred children and adolescents (68 females and 255 males). Proactive aggression and reactive aggression were assessed using the Proactive/Reactive Aggression Scale. Demographic, historical, family, diagnostic, and treatment variables were entered into stepwise regression analyses to determine correlates of proactive and reactive aggression in males and females. Results reveal high rates of aggression in both males and females in the sample. Self reported drug use, expressed hostility, and experiences of maladaptive parenting were correlated with proactive aggression for both genders. Hyperactive/impulsive behaviors were correlated with male reactive aggression. An early age of traumatic stress and a low verbal IQ were correlated with female proactive aggression. Gender differences in correlates of proactive and reactive aggression may provide possible targets for research, prevention, and treatment efforts focused on reducing maladaptive aggression in clinically referred youth.

Для цитирования: Connor Daniel F, Steingard Ronald J, Anderson Jennifer J, Melloni Richard H. Gender differences in reactive and proactive aggression.. Child psychiatry and human development. 2003. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023084112561.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.