MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3201/eid0909.030068

Медицинская библиотека · Emerging infectious diseases · 2003

Aseptic meningitis epidemic during a West Nile virus avian epizootic.

Julian Kathleen G, Mullins James A, Olin Annette, Peters Heather, Nix W Allan, Oberste M Steven, Lovchik Judith C, Bergmann Amy, Brechner Ross J, Myers Robert A, Marfin Anthony A, Campbell Grant L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

While enteroviruses have been the most commonly identified cause of aseptic meningitis in the United States, the role of the emerging, neurotropic West Nile virus (WNV) is not clear. In summer 2001, an aseptic meningitis epidemic occurring in an area of a WNV epizootic in Baltimore, Maryland, was investigated to determine the relative contributions of WNV and enteroviruses. A total of 113 aseptic meningitis cases with onsets from June 1 to September 30, 2001, were identified at six hospitals. WNV immunoglobulin M tests were negative for 69 patients with available specimens; however, 43 (61%) of 70 patients tested enterovirus-positive by viral culture or polymerase chain reaction. Most (76%) of the serotyped enteroviruses were echoviruses 13 and 18. Enteroviruses, including previously rarely detected echoviruses, likely caused most aseptic meningitis cases in this epidemic. No WNV meningitis cases were identified. Even in areas of WNV epizootics, enteroviruses continue to be important causative agents of aseptic meningitis.

Для цитирования: Julian Kathleen G, Mullins James A, Olin Annette, Peters Heather, Nix W Allan, Oberste M Steven, Lovchik Judith C, Bergmann Amy, Brechner Ross J, Myers Robert A, Marfin Anthony A, Campbell Grant L. Aseptic meningitis epidemic during a West Nile virus avian epizootic.. Emerging infectious diseases. 2003. DOI: 10.3201/eid0909.030068.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.