The Medical journal of Australia · 2001
Carols in the wind.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marley J E, Searle P, Chamberlain N L, Turnbull D R, Leahy C M
Аннотация
AIM: To compare mood and emotional responses to music played on pipe organs and pipeless (digital) organs.
DESIGN: A two-organ (pipe v. digital) crossover study.
SETTING: St Theodore's Anglican Church, Adelaide.
SUBJECTS: 43 non-musician volunteers.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in mood and emotions measured by the Profile of Mood States.
RESULTS: Both instruments produced significant reductions in the emotions commonly experienced during the Christmas season: tension-anxiety, depression-rejection, anger-hostility and fatigue. There were no significant changes for vigour or confusion-bewilderment, and no significant differences between the mood-altering effects of the two instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: Pipeless organs are as effective as pipe organs in inducing beneficial mood changes.
DESIGN: A two-organ (pipe v. digital) crossover study.
SETTING: St Theodore's Anglican Church, Adelaide.
SUBJECTS: 43 non-musician volunteers.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in mood and emotions measured by the Profile of Mood States.
RESULTS: Both instruments produced significant reductions in the emotions commonly experienced during the Christmas season: tension-anxiety, depression-rejection, anger-hostility and fatigue. There were no significant changes for vigour or confusion-bewilderment, and no significant differences between the mood-altering effects of the two instruments.
CONCLUSIONS: Pipeless organs are as effective as pipe organs in inducing beneficial mood changes.