MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.arcped.2003.12.004

Медицинская библиотека · Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie · 2004

[A study of 100 consecutive children presenting with learning disabilities].

Cuvellier J C, Pandit F, Casalis S, Lemaître M P, Cuisset J M, Platof A, Vallée L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

DESIGN

To determine the impact of a neuropediatrician view on diagnosis and management of learning disabilities.

METHOD: Retrospective review of the medical records of the last 100 children attending for learning disabilities from 1st June 2000 through 31st May 2001. Assessment concerned school curriculum, type of management before consultation, diagnosis procedure and type of management following consultation. Differential diagnosis was made in 100% of cases following evaluation.

RESULTS

The three main diagnoses were attentionnal deficit disorder with hyperactivity (39%), mental retardation (17%) and dyslexia (7%). Mental retardation and cerebral palsy diagnoses had not been made before consultation. Conversely, 70% of the diagnoses of dyslexia made before consultation were incorrect. Medical treatment was proposed in 38% of cases and modification in the management in 59% of cases.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the interest of a rigorous diagnosis procedure for learning disabilities, based on a neuropediatrics examination, a cognitive evaluation and phonological and lexical evaluation. It only may lead to an appropriate management.

Для цитирования: Cuvellier J C, Pandit F, Casalis S, Lemaître M P, Cuisset J M, Platof A, Vallée L. [A study of 100 consecutive children presenting with learning disabilities].. Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2003.12.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.