MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1024/1422-4917.31.4.255

Медицинская библиотека · Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie · 2003

[Analysis of EEG coherence in examination of an automation deficit in reading-spelling disorder--a pilot study].

Schneider A, Esser G, Sommerfeld E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Do dyslexic children exhibit a general automatizational deficit as well as a phonological deficit?

METHODS

In 16 children aged 9-11 years the reaction time, the number of mistakes and EEG (19 scalp electrodes) were measured in three experiments (verbal and nonverbal). The EEG data was baseline-corrected and after a fast fourier transformation, analyzed with the coherence tool of the Brainvision Software.

RESULTS

The dyslexic group made more mistakes than the control group on all tasks but their reaction times were significantly longer only on the verbal tasks. There were no coherence differences on the nonverbal task. On the language-dependent tasks the dyslexics showed higher total-frontal and lower left-frontal coherences only in the theta-frequency range, while in the alpha and beta frequency ranges coherences did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

A language-dependent cognitive automatizational deficit in the dyslexic group is assumed that is depicted by the higher synchronization of total-frontal coherences (involvement of the central executive) and is based on the less established functional coupling of cortical subsystems for language processing.

Для цитирования: Schneider A, Esser G, Sommerfeld E. [Analysis of EEG coherence in examination of an automation deficit in reading-spelling disorder--a pilot study].. Zeitschrift fur Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 2003. DOI: 10.1024/1422-4917.31.4.255.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.