MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00145-7

Медицинская библиотека · Brain and language · 2003

Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: a comparison of dyslexic and normal readers.

Grainger Jonathan, Bouttevin Sébastien, Truc Cathy, Bastien Mireille, Ziegler Johannes

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Identification of letters embedded in briefly presented words (e.g., TABLE), pseudowords (e.g., TOBLE), and illegal nonwords (e.g., TPBFE) was measured using the Reicher-Wheeler paradigm. Children diagnosed as dyslexic and showing a clear disadvantage in recognizing and reading aloud words and pseudowords (compared to chronological age-matched controls) showed a pattern of results that was qualitatively identical to both reading age and chronological age control children. In all three groups a small nonsignificant advantage was obtained for letter identification in words compared to pseudowords, and a massive advantage for letter identification in pseudowords compared to illegal nonwords. A group of adult participants tested with the same materials showed the classic word superiority effect as well as a pseudoword advantage over illegal nonwords. These results suggest that the pseudoword superiority effect is subtended by regularities operating at the level of sublexical orthographic representations (orthotactic constraints). This phenomenon could provide a useful tool for future investigations of the development of orthotactic constraints during reading acquisition.

Для цитирования: Grainger Jonathan, Bouttevin Sébastien, Truc Cathy, Bastien Mireille, Ziegler Johannes. Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: a comparison of dyslexic and normal readers.. Brain and language. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00145-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.