Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2013
Maximal aerobic and anaerobic exercise responses in children with cerebral palsy.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Balemans Astrid C J, Van Wely Leontien, De Heer Susan J A, Van den Brink Janneke, De Koning Jos J, Becher Jules G, Dallmeijer Annet J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to compare the maximal aerobic and anaerobic exercise responses of children with cerebral palsy (CP) by level of motor impairment and in comparison with those of typically developing children (TD).
METHODS: Seventy children with CP, with varying levels of motor impairment (Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) I-III), and 31 TD performed an incremental continuous maximal aerobic exercise test and a 20-s anaerobic Wingate test on a cycle ergometer. Peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak), anaerobic threshold (AT), peak ventilation (V˙Epeak), peak oxygen pulse (peak O2 pulse), peak ventilatory equivalent of oxygen (peak V˙E/V˙O2) and carbon dioxide (peak V˙E/V˙CO2), peak aerobic power output (POpeak), and mean anaerobic power (P20mean) were measured. Isometric leg muscle strength was determined as a secondary outcome.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed a lower V˙O2peak for CP (I: 35.5 ± 1.2 (SE); II: 33.9 ± 1.6; III: 29.3 ± 2.5 mL·kg-1·min-1) compared with TD (41.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.001) and a similar effect for AT (I: 19.4 ± 0.9; II: 19.2 ± 1.2; III: 15.5 ± 1.9; TD: 24.1 ± 1.0 mL·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.001). V˙Epeak and peak O2 pulse were also lower, whereas peak V˙E/V˙CO2 was higher in CP compared with TD (P < 0.05) and peak V˙E/V˙O2 similar between groups. All these variables showed no differences for different motor impairment levels. POpeak was lower for CP (I: 2.4 ± 0.1; II: 1.8 ± 0.1; III: 1.4 ± 0.2 W·kg-1) versus TD (3.0 ± 0.1, P < 0.001), together with a lower P20mean in CP (I: 4.6 ± 0.2; II: 3.3 ± 0.2; III: 2.5 ± 0.4 W·kg-1) versus TD (6.4 ± 0.2, P < 0.001), and both decreased significantly with increasing motor impairment.
CONCLUSION: Children with CP have decreased aerobic and anaerobic exercise responses, but decreases in respiratory and aerobic exercise responses were not as severe as predicted by motor impairment. Future research should reveal the role of inactivity on the exercise responses of children with CP and possibilities for improvement through training interventions.
METHODS: Seventy children with CP, with varying levels of motor impairment (Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) I-III), and 31 TD performed an incremental continuous maximal aerobic exercise test and a 20-s anaerobic Wingate test on a cycle ergometer. Peak oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak), anaerobic threshold (AT), peak ventilation (V˙Epeak), peak oxygen pulse (peak O2 pulse), peak ventilatory equivalent of oxygen (peak V˙E/V˙O2) and carbon dioxide (peak V˙E/V˙CO2), peak aerobic power output (POpeak), and mean anaerobic power (P20mean) were measured. Isometric leg muscle strength was determined as a secondary outcome.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed a lower V˙O2peak for CP (I: 35.5 ± 1.2 (SE); II: 33.9 ± 1.6; III: 29.3 ± 2.5 mL·kg-1·min-1) compared with TD (41.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.001) and a similar effect for AT (I: 19.4 ± 0.9; II: 19.2 ± 1.2; III: 15.5 ± 1.9; TD: 24.1 ± 1.0 mL·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.001). V˙Epeak and peak O2 pulse were also lower, whereas peak V˙E/V˙CO2 was higher in CP compared with TD (P < 0.05) and peak V˙E/V˙O2 similar between groups. All these variables showed no differences for different motor impairment levels. POpeak was lower for CP (I: 2.4 ± 0.1; II: 1.8 ± 0.1; III: 1.4 ± 0.2 W·kg-1) versus TD (3.0 ± 0.1, P < 0.001), together with a lower P20mean in CP (I: 4.6 ± 0.2; II: 3.3 ± 0.2; III: 2.5 ± 0.4 W·kg-1) versus TD (6.4 ± 0.2, P < 0.001), and both decreased significantly with increasing motor impairment.
CONCLUSION: Children with CP have decreased aerobic and anaerobic exercise responses, but decreases in respiratory and aerobic exercise responses were not as severe as predicted by motor impairment. Future research should reveal the role of inactivity on the exercise responses of children with CP and possibilities for improvement through training interventions.