Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2011
Examination of the functional mobility assessment tool for children and adolescents with lower extremity amputations.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pierce Sarah, Fergus Andrea, Brady Brooks, Wolff-Burke Melissa
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the validity of the Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) for children and adolescents with lower extremity amputations.
METHODS: Twenty-five subjects (mean age = 12.36 ± 1.42 years) with lower extremity amputations and 12 subjects (mean age = 10.25 ± 1.42 years) with typical development were examined using the FMA, which includes the Timed Up and Go, Timed Up and Down Stairs, 9-minute walk/run, heart rate, and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion. A subjective interview was also performed including questions related to pain, walking satisfaction, and participation in and challenges with various physical activities.
RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between the control and amputation groups in FMA score and 3 individual items (P < .05). However, no differences were identified between groups for other items on the FMA.
CONCLUSION: Discriminant validity of the FMA as a whole is supported. However, reevaluation of the items within the FMA is warranted.
METHODS: Twenty-five subjects (mean age = 12.36 ± 1.42 years) with lower extremity amputations and 12 subjects (mean age = 10.25 ± 1.42 years) with typical development were examined using the FMA, which includes the Timed Up and Go, Timed Up and Down Stairs, 9-minute walk/run, heart rate, and Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion. A subjective interview was also performed including questions related to pain, walking satisfaction, and participation in and challenges with various physical activities.
RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between the control and amputation groups in FMA score and 3 individual items (P < .05). However, no differences were identified between groups for other items on the FMA.
CONCLUSION: Discriminant validity of the FMA as a whole is supported. However, reevaluation of the items within the FMA is warranted.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Activities of Daily LivingAdolescentAmputation, SurgicalChildDisability EvaluationExercise TestFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansLower ExtremityMaleMobility LimitationMotor ActivityPhysical ExertionPhysical Therapy ModalitiesReproducibility of ResultsStatistics as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult