The Journal of dermatological treatment · 2015
Patient reported health outcomes and non-adherence in psoriasis patients receiving adalimumab or ustekinumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goren Amir, Carter Chureen, Lee Seina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare health outcomes of patients using biologic therapies ustekinumab (UST) or adalimumab (ADA) for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) and assess biologics non-adherence.
METHODS: Two phases of web-based survey data were collected, assessing adult patients with PsO from a Diplomat® Specialty Pharmacy US claims database (Diplomat Specialty Pharmacy; Flint, MI). Measures included demographics, treatment and health characteristics/behaviors, treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and productivity. Pooled and stratified (by biologics experience) bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: UST (n = 262) versus ADA (n = 83) users more frequently had psoriasis cleared (40.5% versus 15.4%, respectively, with no visible signs), better HRQoL as per Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score = 0 (45.2% versus 19.2%), and higher current effectiveness satisfaction, all p < 0.05. Adjusting for covariates, UST versus ADA bio-naïve patients (n = 68) had better (53.4% lower) DLQI scores, lower percent body surface affected (%BSA; 0.85 versus 1.43), more %BSA improvement (-1.60 versus -1.03), and lower activity impairment (90.4% lower), all p < 0.05. Non-adherence to UST (11.8%) versus ADA (32.5%) was lower, p < 0.05, and more access versus forgetfulness-related. However, no significant differences emerged on outcomes between overall or bio-experienced UST and ADA users.
CONCLUSIONS: UST versus ADA PsO bio-naïve patients reported higher clearing rates, better DLQI, and lower activity impairment.
METHODS: Two phases of web-based survey data were collected, assessing adult patients with PsO from a Diplomat® Specialty Pharmacy US claims database (Diplomat Specialty Pharmacy; Flint, MI). Measures included demographics, treatment and health characteristics/behaviors, treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and productivity. Pooled and stratified (by biologics experience) bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted.
RESULTS: UST (n = 262) versus ADA (n = 83) users more frequently had psoriasis cleared (40.5% versus 15.4%, respectively, with no visible signs), better HRQoL as per Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score = 0 (45.2% versus 19.2%), and higher current effectiveness satisfaction, all p < 0.05. Adjusting for covariates, UST versus ADA bio-naïve patients (n = 68) had better (53.4% lower) DLQI scores, lower percent body surface affected (%BSA; 0.85 versus 1.43), more %BSA improvement (-1.60 versus -1.03), and lower activity impairment (90.4% lower), all p < 0.05. Non-adherence to UST (11.8%) versus ADA (32.5%) was lower, p < 0.05, and more access versus forgetfulness-related. However, no significant differences emerged on outcomes between overall or bio-experienced UST and ADA users.
CONCLUSIONS: UST versus ADA PsO bio-naïve patients reported higher clearing rates, better DLQI, and lower activity impairment.