Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2010
Physical activity measurement using MTI (actigraph) among children with cerebral palsy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Capio Catherine M, Sit Cindy H, Abernethy Bruce
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of MTI accelerometer as a physical activity (PA) measurement instrument for children with cerebral palsy (CP).
DESIGN: Participants were classified within Gross Motor Function Classification System I to III and took part in 2 activity sessions: (1) a structured activity protocol with increasing intensities and (2) a free play session. Concurrent measurements of activity counts, heart rate, and observed physical activity were performed.
SETTING: Data were collected on normal school days in special schools within the participants' 30-minute break period.
PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of children with CP (N=31; 17 girls, 14 boys) age between 6 and 14 years (mean +/- SD, 9.71+/-2.52 y).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MTI measured activity counts, a monitoring device measured heart rate, and the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) was used for direct PA observation.
RESULTS: There were strong relationships between MTI and SOFIT (r=.75; R(2)=.56; P<.001) and heart rate monitor (HRM) and SOFIT (r=.65; R(2)=.43; P<.001) data in structured activities, but the difference between these 2 correlation coefficients was not significant (P=.46). In free play activities, the association between MTI and SOFIT data (r=.67; R(2)=.45; P<.001) was significantly stronger (P=.01) than that between heart rate and SOFIT data (r=.14; R(2)=.02; P<.001) . Bland-Altman plots showed better agreement between observed SOFIT and MTI-predicted SOFIT data than observed SOFIT and HRM-predicted SOFIT data from the linear regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the MTI appears to be a valid instrument for measuring raw activity volume among children with CP and is suitable for use in studies attempting to characterize the PA of this population.
DESIGN: Participants were classified within Gross Motor Function Classification System I to III and took part in 2 activity sessions: (1) a structured activity protocol with increasing intensities and (2) a free play session. Concurrent measurements of activity counts, heart rate, and observed physical activity were performed.
SETTING: Data were collected on normal school days in special schools within the participants' 30-minute break period.
PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of children with CP (N=31; 17 girls, 14 boys) age between 6 and 14 years (mean +/- SD, 9.71+/-2.52 y).
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MTI measured activity counts, a monitoring device measured heart rate, and the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) was used for direct PA observation.
RESULTS: There were strong relationships between MTI and SOFIT (r=.75; R(2)=.56; P<.001) and heart rate monitor (HRM) and SOFIT (r=.65; R(2)=.43; P<.001) data in structured activities, but the difference between these 2 correlation coefficients was not significant (P=.46). In free play activities, the association between MTI and SOFIT data (r=.67; R(2)=.45; P<.001) was significantly stronger (P=.01) than that between heart rate and SOFIT data (r=.14; R(2)=.02; P<.001) . Bland-Altman plots showed better agreement between observed SOFIT and MTI-predicted SOFIT data than observed SOFIT and HRM-predicted SOFIT data from the linear regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the MTI appears to be a valid instrument for measuring raw activity volume among children with CP and is suitable for use in studies attempting to characterize the PA of this population.