MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1006/jecp.1996.0052

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of experimental child psychology · 1996

The development of spelling procedures in French-speaking, normal and reading-disabled children: effects of frequency and lexicality.

Alegria J, Mousty P

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The spelling procedures of normal and reading-disabled French-speaking children matched for reading level were examined. Subjects had to spell frequent and infrequent words containing either inconsistent nondominant graphonemes (e.g., /s/ spelled "c" as in "cigarette," the dominant spelling for /s/ being "s") or consistent context-dependent graphonemes (e.g., /g/ followed by "i"-->"gu") as well as pseudo-words including inconsistent graphonemes presented in different phonological contexts (e.g., /s/ can be spelled "s" or "c" if the following vowel is /i/, but "c" is incorrect if the following vowel is /y/). At the lowest reading level, frequency effects were totally absent in both groups of children. Also, signs of taking the context into account in applying rules were observed only in the normal group. As reading ability progresses, the effects of both word frequency and contextual constraints to rule application increase. Those phenomena were weaker in reading-disabled than in normal readers. It is suggested that disabled readers could use partial cues that allow reading but do not supply complete representations of words to the orthographic lexicon.

Для цитирования: Alegria J, Mousty P. The development of spelling procedures in French-speaking, normal and reading-disabled children: effects of frequency and lexicality.. Journal of experimental child psychology. 1996. DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1996.0052.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.