MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf00788953

Медицинская библиотека · Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 1992

Staff-patient relationships in the care of the long-term adult mentally ill. A content analysis of Expressed Emotion interviews.

Moore E, Kuipers L, Ball R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Analysis of the content of 61 interviews with keyworkers supporting chronically disabled patients in long-term care settings revealed a range of EE ratings and associated characteristics. Low-EE interviews were prevalent (n = 46), a finding not unlikely given the experience and training of the staff group sampled. High-EE (n = 15) relationships were characterised by less tolerance, inappropriate expectations of patient progress and frustration in the key worker. Criticism in both high- and low-EE interviews was most frequently focused on socially embarrassing or difficult behaviour and, to a slightly lesser extent, the clinical poverty syndrome. It was rarely directed at positive symptomatology. High levels of criticism were significantly related to regarding the patient's difficulties as within their control and having negative rather than positive expectations of their ability to manage on their own. The factors identified by the EE interview that influence the nature of the staff-patient relationship are discussed, and the clinical implications of the findings briefly considered.

Для цитирования: Moore E, Kuipers L, Ball R. Staff-patient relationships in the care of the long-term adult mentally ill. A content analysis of Expressed Emotion interviews.. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology. 1992. DOI: 10.1007/bf00788953.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.