MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/002221949102400906

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of learning disabilities · 1991

A trial of piracetam in two subgroups of students with dyslexia enrolled in summer tutoring.

Ackerman P T, Dykman R A, Holloway C, Paal N P, Gocio M Y

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Sixty children with dyslexia (41 boys, 19 girls; ages 9 to 13) were enrolled in a 10-week summer tutoring program that emphasized word-building skills. They were randomly and blindly assigned to receive either placebo or piracetam, a purportedly memory-enhancing drug that has been reported to facilitate reading skill acquisition. The children were subtyped as "dysphonetic" or "phonetic" on the basis of scores from tests of phonological sensitivity and phoneme-grapheme correspondence skills. Of the 53 children who completed the program, 37 were classified as dysphonetic and 16 as phonetic. The phonetic group improved significantly more in word-recognition ability than the dysphonetic group. Overall, the children on medication did not improve more than the nonmedicated ones in any aspect of reading. The phonetic subgroup on piracetam gained more in word recognition than any subgroup but did not improve significantly more than the phonetic subgroup on placebo. Results are discussed in relation to findings from previous studies of piracetam in children with dyslexia.

Для цитирования: Ackerman P T, Dykman R A, Holloway C, Paal N P, Gocio M Y. A trial of piracetam in two subgroups of students with dyslexia enrolled in summer tutoring.. Journal of learning disabilities. 1991. DOI: 10.1177/002221949102400906.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.